
In keeping with the promise made in my previous article, "Visionary Terms", this is the first in a series of articles where we will explore both the history of the Presidential candidates and try to get a clear view of the vision they offer to the American people for their future.
Rudy Giuliani once was, for many, a name vaguely associated with New York, police brutality, and perhaps personal controversy for those addicted to tabloid headlines. It was not until September 11, 2001, when the World Trade Center came tumbling to the ground and New York became the center of America's anger, fear, and grieving, that Mayor Guiliani became a household name.
Rudy Giuliani was born in Brooklyn, NY in 1944 to second-generation Italian-American parents. He grew up in a working class, Catholic family, with a mix of "honest, decent citizens" and more dubious characters. He attended Manhattan College, and then New York University School of Law, from which he graduated cum laude in 1968. During these years he had student deferments to keep him out of the draft for the Vietnam War, and after graduation he became employed as a clerk for Judge Lloyd MacMahon, who wrote a special request to the draft board asking for another deferment for Giuliani, classifying him as an "essential employee".
In 1970, Giuliani moved on to join the Office of the U.S. Attorney, and three years later became chief of the Narcotics Unit. In 1975, he became Associate Deputy Attorney General and chief of staff to the Deputy Attorney General in Washington, D.C. From 1977-1981 Giuliani worked in private law, until in 1981 he was appointed Associate Attorney General under President Ronald Reagan. In 1983 he was made U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, where he started making some headlines with high-profile cases.
In 1989, Giuliani ran for mayor of New York, losing the race to David Dinkins. Undeterred, he ran again in 1993, where his vows to clean up the city and crack down on crime won him the election by a relatively small margin. In 1997 he won his reelection by a much larger percentage, mostly due to his image as a "tough" mayor who had been responsible for the turn around in New York's crime rate. It has been debated whether his hard-line tactics actually were the cause of the improved crime rate, or whether he was simply the beneficiary of a nation wide trend resulting from an improvement in the country's economy, but either way the end result was the creation of an image of Giuliani as a man who gets things done. The other face of this image, however, is that of a man who turns a blind eye to police brutality in a Machiavellian stance of "the end justifies the means". Under Giuliani's watch, New York received the highest number of reports of police brutality and misconduct in its history.
On 9/11, Giuliani found himself facing one of the most tragic and overwhelming events in America's past. New York City was awash in fear and speculation, and he gained national recognition in his efforts to keep order and soothe a devastated constituency. His frequent television and radio appearances assured the nation that everything was as under control as it could be, that recovery efforts were moving forward, that America would prevail. Critics allege that Giuliani's speeches were merely that: speeches. That behind the nobly grieving facade, Giuliani bumbled repeatedly in his organizational efforts, making decisions both before and after 9/11 which cost lives during the rescue. Nevertheless, the image of Giuliani as "America's Mayor" stands, mostly untarnished.
As Giuliani begins to rev up for his Presidential bid, he seems anxious to present America with a vision of strength and safety. He often references his presence at "Ground Zero" on 9/11, as a model for what kind of leadership he believes we need. Likewise, he references his success in turning around New York City's crime rate as a model for what the United States can become. Thus far, he has been noncommittal with regards to international issues, saying that withdrawal from Iraq would be a mistake, but hedging that losing the war in Iraq will not end the War on Terror. He has not taken a stand on international trade or how to deal with an increasingly powerful China, but he has stated that we should open the oil reserves as a means of dealing with rising fuel prices. He recently revealed that he does accept the evidence of global warming, and feels that large corporations must be forced to limit pollution if we are going to combat it. Based on his previous actions, then, and his current statements, let's take a look at what Giuliani's vision for America might look like.
Giuliani appears to envisage a world which balances delicately on the juncture where conservatism meets liberalism. Gay marriage would be accepted and abortion would continue to be legal, but there would be "decency standards" for publicly funded institutions. Exactly what standards these would be is unclear, for while Giuliani is a Catholic, he does not support prayer in school or using religion as a foundation for government. The government would become smaller, with less bureaucracy and more technology. Taxes would be cut, but so would welfare, as Giuliani believes staunchly in a social contract where every service has a responsibility to accompany it. Job training centers would replace welfare centers, and everyone would have a job, including illegal immigrants, whom would swiftly be set on the right track for full citizenship.
Crime would be a thing of the past in Giuliani's future, but at the sacrifice of personal privacy and some civil rights. An extensive, detailed computer network would hold fingerprints and DNA information for all American citizens, and law enforcement would be given great leniency to pursue even the smallest crimes. Graffiti, panhandling, and shoplifting would become a thing of the past, and more heinous crimes would be met with swift punishment. Children would walk safely through the streets, if only because no one would dare to provoke the wrath of the well equipped and infallible civilian police force.
The education system would be revamped, with an emphasis on competition and consumer choice, with a wide range of public, private, and charter schools available. Technological advancement would be pushed on many levels, from the classroom to the laboratory, with computers on every desk and stem cell research being federally funded. With such encouragement, who knows what other scientific advancements would be right around the corner?
On the international stage, we can only guess with regards to Giuliani's vision, but his statements thus far regarding Iraq and his belief in zero-tolerance policies allow us to make an educated guess. We can assume aggressive military action would be a route Giuliani would be willing to continue to follow, though perhaps preceded by efforts at "tough talk" diplomacy, in the tradition of President Reagan, whom he admires deeply. His professed belief in the need to crack down on large corporations in order to curb global warming would be at odds with his previous actions to ensure economic growth in New York City, and so perhaps he would offer incentives, rather than legal requirements.
Giuliani's vision of the future is a picture of blue-white tranquility, with the silent evenings coasting by the windows of the righteously resting. We the people work hard by day, keep the system moving with the financial rewards of our efforts in the evenings, and settle down in complacent tranquility at night to sleep the sleep of the innocent. The worries with which we trouble ourselves now will fade into the past like the bad dreams they were, and we will put our trust in the representatives of the government to keep all moral detritus swept off of our streets and out of our grasp.
Rudy Giuliani clearly has a vision. The only question remaining is whether it is one in which we want to live.
I dunno -- if your view of his views holds true: I sort of see him as the "flashback" scene of a sci-fi film in which future America is overrun by a police state. It would explain how Rudy Giuliani had a great vision for how things ought to be, but that his (mostly well-intentioned) vision was co-opted throughout the years and has become what we see now -- in the year 2050.
I don't like that he seems to balance at a dangerous tipping point on several issues and don't trust that the balance could be maintained.
Sounds like Singapore, except with 300 million people and superpower power. I'm going to stock up on chewing gum, even though I don't chew.
Alright, let me throw this out there. I'm not going to vote for Rudy, but isn't he about a hundred times better than any other Republican candidate who can possibly get the nomination? He's socially very liberal. So what if he's hawkish and wants to take away our rights to privacy for the sake of national security.
In the Republican pool, isn't he the least of all evil? If we're going to live in a police state anyway, wouldn't you rather live a police state where gays can get married and women still have the right to choose?
As long as I can have my social security number tattooed on the back of my neck as a barcode I'm all for it.
I also agree Rudy is the "best worst choice" but without the support of the religious right I'm not sure how he wins the election. The religious right won't hold their nose and vote for Rudy just because he's a Republican. Turnout will be lower than 00/04 and so will donations. Contrast that with Obama, Gore or Clinton running on the left (record turnout, record donations) and there's no way Rudy wins. He'll do quite well, no doubt, but he will lose.
ScooterDMan: This is certainly a novel idea. I'm not sure that I don't agree with your assessment of Guiliani as the "least of all evil" Republican in the pool of candidates. But, if you follow the links in Celestina's articles, much of what Guiliani claims as accomplishments of his mayorhood in NYC are not clearly his successes. Some of them involved muddling through anyhow (like the police and fire communication during 9/11); some of them had undesirable side effects (like the police brutality complaints that became epidemic while he was cleaning up crime in NYC); and some had very little to do with Guiliani at all, apart from brokering tax breaks for big corporations (like the Times Square cleanup). The man clearly sees many of the problems we are facing, such as a broken public education system; I just don't think I would like some of his solutions, or the means he would choose to pursue those solutions. Of course, I think his lack of knowledge and experience in international areas would also be a big problem.
Thanks, Celestina for a really careful examination of Guiliani's vision; I have defintely become smarter here with regard to this candidate.
Good points, Cassandra. My uncle who has been a long-time New York City resident has always despised Giuliani with quite a passion. Before I was old enough to really understand (Giuliani became mayor when I was 15), my uncle used to talk about how he took responsibilty for solving NY's homeless problem, but had merely pushed out the homeless into areas surrounding Manhattan, which created new problems outside the city.
Then again, against what standard do we measure one's "success" as mayor of a city like NY? It seems like being mayor of the busiest city in the world must be an ungodly job. Guiliani is certainly not infallible (his extramarital affair is sure to be a major talking point), but regardless of his misgivings, I think he still emerges as the most palatable Republican for a bleeding heart like me.
Which must mean, of course, he is patently unelectable.
Celestina,
A profound look into a study of Giuliani even though I always have high expectations of your writing, this was a wonderful read.
As to Giuliani I like the other liberals believe that he's the best the Republicans have to offer. My significant other is a native New Yorker and no matter the intransigence of his high handed ways she swears to the effectiveness of his policies in New York and the benefits thereof.
As to his performance, which I believe it was, during 9/11 no matter the rhetoric the only person to compare him with was little George and as a comparative there was no comparison, he was everything George wasn't, and I for one would feel, if we have to have a Republican he would hands down be my pick. In fact when we look at the current 08 presidential candidates it may be I like him better than all of them. My only concern would be foreign policy, and corporate governance. On the other hand NO ONE is going to fix our foreign policy in even 2 terms, with the possible exception of Kucinich. As to corporate governance I hold little help as all the candidates will beholding out their hands to the boys with the money, and payback is a @!$%#.
Thanks again for a wonderful article,
Forest
Guiliani Sept. 10, 2001: manipulated crime statistics, insane taxes, expensive housing, abusive police tactics in minority neighborhoods, and black employment down in all city agencies.
Guiliani Sept. 11, 2001: America's Mayor.
He wasn't a great mayor prior to September 11th. Perception is everything. He is building his candidacy for presidency on that perception.
Let us not forget the Art Police and the street crossing corrals plus he never did fix those damn potholes!
Celestina, excellent job of covering Giuliani's days in the U.S. Attorney's Office and the events that led him to become Mayor of New York. While I followed Giuliani rather closely through the mid-1990s while he served as NY's Mayor, I was unaware of his U.S. Attorney background or that he graduated from NYU Law cum laude. Rudy is a NY Republican and while he is tough on crime I do not see the police state mentality occurring on his watch (were he electable).
National crime statistics do not create effects. Disagree with his tactics, Giuliani made immediate and notable changes that I directly witnessed over a 24 month period between 1995-1997. It was amazing the difference in how safe going through Chinatown after midnight (or anywhere in most of Manhattan except alphabet city or LES at that time) was after Giuliani started his crackdown. Criminals, gangs, and organized crime were as tough and unified as they come in NY. Carrying anything other than a big stick and the means to swing it would have resulted in a beat down that Rudy and the rest of the law-abising citizens of NY would not soon have forgotten. Were there incidents that made national news? You bet. In a city of 8 million people, there are going to be mistakes made that are noteworthy of headlines. Was that Rudy's fault? Casualties of war, even war on crime, are unfortunate byproducts of taking action. The results in NY were part of no national trend. They were totally Giuliani.
Whether Giuliani is able to operate at a national level, that is a completely different issue and one where I think questions are more properly directed at RG. The same could be said for Barak, who, to my knowledge, like Rudy, has not accomplished anything of significance on a national scale as of yet.
Having watched this man operate since 1995, I am a big fan of Rudy's Whether that will translate in my vote remains to be seen. I will vote for the person that I believe is able to lead our Country, and the world, out of the quagmire that I see trying to suck everyone in.
Again, nice article. I look forward to the remaining pieces of your series C.
Not getting my vote. His gun control problems are way out of line...
celestina, thanks for this introspective piece. rudy is a complex figure~ you never really know what is going on in his head, and that is discomforting.
i look forward to your future "vision" piece on Obama~have you heard his podcasts? they are really interesting. he is so articulate, very honest, and never villanizes anyone like most politicians. commendable character.
Celestina, there you go again. This article is just what is needed in these times. A cool, collected, complete summary of the candidates background and possible future. Thanks, this sure helps me in understanding as much as possible about our immediate political future. This campaign may just be for the survival of our nation, you will have helped bring about an enlightened vote. Thanks for being here.
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |